🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.