The Four Spent the Day Together by author Chris Kraus – An Iconic Writer Ventures Into Something New

The new book is populated with protagonists pursuing fresh starts, trying to break free from drugs or abusive marriages, only to see hope turn into aggression. Kraus often employs the phrase "fresh start", transforming it into intentionally weary through its repetitions. Phrases such as "He could make a fresh start" and "They chose to begin anew" are scattered across the text. And yet, she is embarking on her own fresh start, as this presents as a different type of work – observational, truly literary. Yet it proves to be packed with the familiar conflicts and styles as her previous works.

From Unplanned Author to Renowned Book

The writer was originally an visual artist who transitioned to writing unintentionally with her 1997 cult classic I Love Dick, made up of letters to an unreceptive lover, elevating personal female narrative from self-debasement into assassination. She kept producing books, but the three subsequent engaging and challenging novels did not possess the impact and rawness that the letter form brought to the narrative voice of I Love Dick. Compounding this was her position as a renegade artist who had turned into a major property owner, so there was significant attention on property transactions. It is logical that she currently desires to explore different types of content, turning outward to other people's stories, at a period in which she states that current political era turns intimate literature unnecessary.

Several Eras, Shared Inescapable History

The Four Spent the Day Together is structured in three parts, encompassing multiple eras – all unable to escape their histories. There is the narrative about characters Emma and Jasper, representations of the author's parents, moving from the New York borough to a pastoral setting. Additionally the account of Kraus, in the guise of protagonist Catt Greene, grappling with the belated success of I Love Dick, the rise of Trump, and her addict husband Paul. The third thread involves the story of the murder of one directionless individual by another in a locality largely deserted by liberal ideals only a short distance from the protagonist's home in a remote part of Minnesota.

For this reader drawn to refined literature of the kind the author herself tends to eschew, I was enchanted by the literary tone of the initial segment.

As a reader who favors honed writing of the variety that the author often disregards, I was seduced by the storytelling approach of the opening segment. It exhibits a new quality of attentiveness that makes room for small details, like the pail that the young Catt pries out of frozen water at the start of the story, helped by her beloved father. "I discovered a frozen plaything!" she exclaims; "a nice toy", he replies, "the ambiguous meanings of language circulating in their speech like hard candy". Kraus writes Emma's narrative with curiosity and intimacy. "Emma experienced a dreamlike sensation – not precisely her dream."

Disappointment and Disjunction

I was fated to feel let down when I wished this different style could last out the book. Kraus says here that she dislikes the pleasure audiences such as myself have derived from I Love Dick; she's committed to disjunction, to the unpolished style she shares with her hero writer Kathy Acker, and the emptiness and redundancy of her previous novels returns in the second segment. The protagonist is attempting to do up three dozen dilapidated units in the most troubled areas of Albuquerque while shuttling between two different states, failing to help her husband curb his addiction. She feels helpless as Paul cycles through low-resource employment as an addiction therapist in a environment fueled by the rage and anxiety that drives Trump's victory. A significant portion discusses about Catt being cancelled on social media, her occupation changed from "writer" to "property owner" on Wikipedia. The author still appears to care a little too much about this. At one point she remarks that she's researching the homicide so that before leaving Minnesota, "she might be able to learn something about an the United States that her Twitter detractors would not understand, would overlook entirely".

The Homicide Account

Then we reach to the actual killing – and the titular day spent by the murdered individual with the perpetrator and his associates. Kraus utilizes compelling foundational content, and reconstructs step by step what happened when the victim Brandon came to meet Brittney after encountering her on a platform where she marketed explicit images. He anticipated intimacy but seems affably to have spent the day with her companions, mooching around having his vehicle repaired and paying for snacks and drugs, before being killed by gunfire by Brittney's boyfriend a man named Micah – a youth with psychological issues who has repeatedly received inpatient care for violent rage.

Fascination and Incompletion

The protagonist becomes fixated by the story, and I found myself captivated by the way that her twin drives towards responsible documentation and reckless transgression tussle in this section. Yet I wished her to go further into her personal fixations here. The compelling persona is Brittney, who becomes vivid in part due to the protagonist's connection to her – yet another intelligent, harassed young woman going off the rails in a struggling, neglected community. Kraus tells us that the protagonist communicates with Brittney in detention, but she fails to enact these dialogues. The complete segment feels oddly unfinished, to the degree that Kraus's narration ends almost mid-par

Arthur Peck
Arthur Peck

Elena Voss is a seasoned journalist and editor with over a decade of experience in digital media and investigative reporting.